Adiabatic Equation Calculator
Calculate minimum CPC and earthing conductor size using S = \u221A(I\u00B2t) / k per BS 7671
Reference Info & Formulas
- Minimum conductor size from adiabatic equation
- Comparison with Table 54.7 simplified method
- Correct k value for your conductor arrangement
- Energy let-through (I\u00B2t)
Reg 543.1.3: Adiabatic equation
Table 54.2: k values (cables)
Table 54.3: k values (bare CPC)
Table 54.5: k values (separate CPC)
Table 54.6: k values (bonding)
Table 54.7: Simplified CPC sizing
Data: BS 7671:2018+A2:2022 \u2014 Regulation 543.1.3, Tables 54.2\u201354.6
For guidance only. The responsibility for any electrical installation lies with the qualified person carrying out the work. Always verify calculations independently and apply professional judgement.
How the Adiabatic Equation Works
The adiabatic equation determines whether a protective conductor can withstand the thermal energy released during a fault, before the protective device disconnects the supply.
During an earth fault, current flows through the protective conductor for the duration of the disconnection time. This current heats the conductor. The adiabatic equation checks that the conductor cross-section is large enough to absorb this energy without exceeding the insulation temperature limit.
S = √(I²t) / k- S
- = Minimum conductor cross-sectional area (mm²)
- I
- = Fault current in amperes (RMS)
- t
- = Disconnection time of the protective device (seconds)
- k
- = Factor for conductor material and insulation type
BS 7671 Regulation 543.1.3
The term I\u00B2t represents the energy let-through of the fault in A\u00B2s. The k value encapsulates the thermal properties of the conductor and its insulation. A higher k value means the conductor can tolerate more energy per mm\u00B2 of cross-section.
Adiabatic Equation vs Table Method
BS 7671 offers two approaches for sizing protective conductors. The table method (Table 54.7) provides a quick lookup based on the line conductor size. The adiabatic equation (Regulation 543.1.3) provides a precise calculation based on actual fault conditions. In practice, the larger of the two results should be used.
When to Use Each Method
k Values from BS 7671
Common k values for copper protective conductors
BS 7671 Tables 54.2\u201354.6| Application | Insulation | k Value | BS 7671 Table |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPC within multi-core cable | PVC 70°C | 115 | Table 54.2 / 54.4 |
| CPC within multi-core cable | XLPE 90°C | 143 | Table 54.2 |
| Separate CPC, not bunched | PVC 70°C | 143 | Table 54.5 |
| Separate CPC, not bunched | XLPE 90°C | 176 | Table 54.5 |
| Bare CPC touching cable sheath | Any | 159 | Table 54.3 |
| Bonding conductor | PVC 70°C | 115 | Table 54.6 |
Aluminium conductors have lower k values. For the full range, refer to BS 7671 directly.
Practical Examples
Example: 32A Ring Final
When Standard CPC Is Not Enough
BS 7671 Regulation References
Key regulations for protective conductor sizing
BS 7671:2018+A2:2022 Chapter 54| Regulation | Description |
|---|---|
| 543.1.1 | General requirements for protective conductors |
| 543.1.3 | Adiabatic equation for CPC sizing |
| 543.1.4 | Simplified method using Table 54.7 |
| Table 54.2 | k values for CPC incorporated in cables |
| Table 54.3 | k values for bare protective conductors |
| Table 54.4 | k values for CPC as a core in cable or bunched |
| Table 54.5 | k values for separate protective conductors not bunched |
| Table 54.6 | k values for bonding conductors |
| Table 54.7 | Minimum CPC sizes from line conductor cross-section |
Frequently Asked Questions
SparkyHub is a free resource built by Taro Schenker — I build websites for trade businesses too.